iFixit Repairability Scores: What Buyers Should Check
How to read iFixit scores, PIRG's 2026 repairability grades, and the repair details that matter before you buy a phone or laptop.
Written by the SolderMag Editorial Team. We update recommendations against current product availability, disclose affiliate links, explain ranking criteria in our testing methodology, and correct material errors through the contact page.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability can change.

Repairability is not just a feel-good spec. It affects how long a phone or laptop stays useful, how much a cracked screen or weak battery costs to fix, and whether a good device becomes e-waste because one part failed.
The short version: use iFixit repairability scores and PIRG's 2026 "Failing the Fix" report as warning lights, not as the only buying filter. A high score is useful. A low score is a reason to look harder at battery access, parts availability, service manuals, storage upgrades, and software support.
Quick answer
If repairability matters, buy products with:
- a published repair score or teardown from a credible source
- easy battery replacement
- available spare parts for consumers or independent shops
- service manuals that are not locked behind an authorized-repair program
- standard screws and minimal adhesive
- modular ports, storage, keyboards, and screens where possible
- long software support, especially for phones
Skip products where the battery, storage, display, ports, or keyboard are bonded, soldered, paired to software, or uneconomical to replace.
What changed in 2026
The most useful 2026 repairability signal is not a single iFixit post. It is the combination of public teardown scoring, European repairability labels, and PIRG's 2026 scorecard.
PIRG's 2026 "Failing the Fix" report uses repairability information from 105 phones and laptops. For phones, it uses the European Union's newer EPREL repair score. For laptops, it continues to use France's repairability index. PIRG also adjusts brand grades based on right-to-repair policy behavior.
The buyer-relevant takeaway is blunt:
| Category | What the 2026 data suggests | What buyers should do | | --- | --- | --- | | Phones | Repair labels are getting more rigorous, especially around disassembly and parts access. | Do not assume a long software promise means the hardware will be easy to fix. | | Laptops | Repairability is mixed and often stagnant by brand. | Check the exact model, not just the logo on the lid. | | Premium devices | Thinness and sealed designs still create repair trade-offs. | Budget for battery and screen repairs before paying flagship money. | | Repair-friendly models | Some business laptops and modular designs are moving in the right direction. | Prefer replaceable batteries, socketed storage, and published manuals when performance is similar. |
How to read iFixit scores
iFixit scores are useful because they come from teardown work, not marketing copy. But they are still model-specific. One repairable ThinkPad does not make every Lenovo laptop repairable. One improved iPhone does not erase parts-pairing or adhesive issues in other models.
When reading an iFixit page, look past the number and check the reason:
- Battery access: battery replacements are the most common repair that can extend a device's life.
- Screen access: cracked screens are common and often expensive.
- Port modularity: USB-C, Thunderbolt, and charging ports take daily abuse.
- Storage and memory: replaceable SSDs and RAM can turn a three-year laptop into a five-year laptop.
- Tools and fasteners: standard screws beat glue, rivets, and proprietary fasteners.
- Parts and manuals: a device is only repairable if you can actually get the part and instructions.
- Software locks: parts pairing can make a physical repair less useful unless the manufacturer supports calibration.
The score is the headline. The repair notes are the buying advice.
What PIRG's 2026 report adds
PIRG's report is useful because it looks at brand behavior as well as device design. That matters because repairability is an ecosystem. A laptop with a removable battery is less helpful if replacement parts are unavailable. A phone with a technically replaceable screen is less repairable if software warnings or calibration barriers punish the repair.
For buyers, PIRG's grading is best used to answer three questions:
- Does this manufacturer make repair information easy to find?
- Does it sell parts to normal buyers and independent repair shops?
- Does its policy behavior support repair, or fight it?
That is a different lens from a benchmark chart. It will not tell you which laptop is fastest. It tells you which purchase is less likely to become disposable.
What to check before buying a laptop
For laptops, repairability matters most when you plan to keep the machine for more than three years.
Prioritize:
- Battery replacement without destroying the chassis.
- M.2 storage instead of soldered storage.
- Socketed or upgradeable memory where your workload benefits.
- Replaceable keyboard, display, fan, and ports.
- A service manual with real disassembly steps.
- Parts sold directly or through a reliable parts partner.
Be more cautious with:
- soldered storage on expensive machines
- glued batteries
- riveted keyboards
- displays that are not economical to replace
- proprietary chargers or unusual internal cables
- models where the vendor publishes no repair information
For laptop buying context, see our best budget laptops, MacBook Air M4 review, and mobile developer setup guide. The right answer is not always the most repairable laptop. Sometimes battery life, screen quality, or software support matters more. The point is to price the repair trade-off honestly.
What to check before buying a phone
Phones are harder because almost everything is compact, glued, water-resistant, and tightly integrated. That does not mean repairability is hopeless. It means you need to check the highest-failure parts first.
Prioritize:
- Battery replacement path: pull tabs, reachable battery, and available replacement parts.
- Screen repair path: front-entry screen repairs are usually better than designs that require full rear disassembly.
- USB-C port modularity: a broken charging port should not require a full logic-board replacement.
- Repair documentation: public instructions matter.
- Software support: a phone that stops getting updates is not a good long-term buy even if the hardware survives.
Be careful with:
- parts pairing that creates warnings or disables features after repair
- heavy adhesive around batteries and screens
- glass backs that make every repair riskier
- premium models where common repairs cost close to a midrange replacement phone
Repairability is not the only buying factor
Do not buy a worse device solely because it has a better repair score. Repairability should break ties and expose hidden ownership costs.
Use this hierarchy:
- Does the device do the job you need?
- Will it receive software support for the period you expect to keep it?
- Are the common failure points repairable at a sane cost?
- Are parts and manuals available outside the manufacturer's own repair channel?
- Is the repair-friendly option close enough in price, performance, and usability?
If two products are otherwise close, buy the one with the easier battery, storage, port, and screen repairs.
The SolderMag buying rule
For phones, assume the battery and screen are the ownership-cost test.
For laptops, assume the battery, storage, keyboard, display, and ports are the ownership-cost test.
If a product fails those checks, it can still be worth buying, but the discount needs to be real. Do not pay flagship money for disposable repair economics unless the device gives you something you cannot get elsewhere.
Sources
- U.S. PIRG Education Fund: Failing the Fix 2026
- iFixit: Repairability overview
- iFixit: Smartphone repairability scores
- iFixit: Laptop repairability scores